I'd like to talk about some recent work of Willwacher and coauthors related to the Grothendieck-Teichmüller Lie algebra \mathfrak{grt}_1 and graph homology. The goal of this first post is modest, just to define \mathfrak{grt}_1 and discuss some of what's known about it. I will be relying heavily on Willwacher's paper for my exposition.
First, we define the Drinfeld-Kohno Lie algebra \mathfrak t_n. It is freely generated as a Lie algebra by elements t_{ij} which are symmetric in the indices t_{ij}=t_{ji} where i\neq j and 1\leq i,j\leq n, subject to relations that [t_{ij},t_{kl}]=0 if the index sets are disjoint and
[t_{ij},t_{ik}]=-[t_{ij},t_{jk}], \text{ if } i,j,k \text{ are distinct indices}. I encountered a similar Lie algebra in a paper of mine, where I noticed that you could interpret iterated brackets as labeled trees. Surely one can do the same here, but with a different sign convention. For example t_{ij} would be a line segment with ends labeled by i and j. The bracket [t_{ij},t_{ik}] would be a tree with one trivalent vertex and three univalent vertices labeled by i,j,k. I am not sure what the sign conventions should be.
Now consider the free Lie algebra on two generators, X and Y, \mathsf{L}(X,Y), and complete it to \hat{\mathsf{L}}. Let \hat{\mathsf{L}}^+ be spanned by elements of degree 3 or higher. Consider \varphi\in\hat{\mathsf{L}}^+ satisfying
\varphi(t_{12},t_{23}+t_{24})+\varphi(t_{13}+t_{23},t_{34})=\varphi(t_{23},t_{24})+
\varphi(t_{12}+t_{13},t_{24}+t_{34})+\varphi(t_{12},t_{23}), where we plug in elements of \mathfrak{t}_4.
The set of such \varphi is the Grothendieck-Teichmüller Lie algebra \mathfrak{grt}_1.
There are actually two auxiliary conditions, such as the fact that \varphi is antisymmetric in X and Y, which are normally given, but they follow from a result of Furusho.
The simplest example of an element of \mathfrak{grt}_1 is the element [X,[X,Y]]-[Y,[Y,X]].
So now that we know what \mathfrak{grt}_1 is, the next question is why do we care? It actually comes from a group \mathsf{GRT}_1, which is related to the space of Drinfeld associators with no quadratic term. It also arises in the algebraic geometry of the mapping class group and Teichmüller space, although I don't understand the story there very well. I believe that it is known that \mathfrak{grt}_1 embeds into the cokernel of the Johnson homomorphism as the set of so called Galois obstructions and this follows from work of Matsumoto and Nakamura.
An extremely important conjecture about \mathfrak{grt}_1 is the following.
Conjecture (Deligne-Mumford-Ihara): \mathfrak{grt}_1 is a free graded Lie algebra with generators \sigma_3,\sigma_5,\ldots.
F. Brown has proven half of this conjecture:
Theorem (F. Brown): The free graded Lie algebra with generators \sigma_3,\sigma_5,\ldots embeds in \mathfrak{grt}_1.
Another remarkable result is the main theorem of Willwacher's paper. Namely, if you take Kontsevich's (commutative) even graph complex \mathsf{GC}_2, then
Theorem (Willwacher): There is an isomorphism H^0(\mathsf{GC}_2)\cong \mathfrak{grt}_1.
I am adopting Willwacher's notation here. Cohomological degree 0 here picks up connected graphs with E=2(V-1). The elements \sigma_{2i+1} have a beautiful (conjectural) description as wheels with 2i+1 spokes, which are indeed cocycles in the graph complex.
So now we have a definition of the Grothendieck-Teichmüller Lie algebra, and some idea of what is known about it and its importance. In my next posts, I intend to explore some of the ideas touched on here. For example I want to talk about \mathsf{GC}_2 in a lot more detail, and explore the connections to the Johnson homomorphism. I'd also like to delve into the details of Willwacher's paper.
No comments:
Post a Comment